08 LS3 with headers, CAI, mild cam

[edcmat-l1]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p58/edcmat-l1/Arashbeforeafter.jpg

[Profit Of Doom]

Looks Really good.. maybe someday I can make numbers like that ;)

[calz28]

nice #'s

[grn95t/a]

very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[socalmach]

Red X :(

[edcmat-l1]

Red X :(

:confused: I'm corn fused???????

[edcmat-l1]

I was pretty happy with it. The customer was originally wanting 440. He just wanted LS7 numbers. I told him we would see 450 with no problem. I was truthfully hoping for 460.

[Jazz]

Almost 470! Nice numbers. Can you get similar numbers from an LS1???

[grn95t/a]

:confused: I'm corn fused???????

x2!!! what the heck does that mean don?

[socalmach]

Most pics won't load on a govt computer.

That thing is nasty!!

[edcmat-l1]

Most pics won't load on a govt computer.

That thing is nasty!!

OK. Gotcha. Now I standunder........

[edcmat-l1]

Almost 470! Nice numbers. Can you get similar numbers from an LS1???

With just a cam swap, that would be a big fat no.
The LS3s are 6.3 litre with L92 heads and L76/LS3 intakes. Headers and a tune and they make 410ish. The before numbers were headers/tune/CAI.
We/I have great results with the L92 head combos. I have 2 of the top 5 power makers on record. One is a 6.0 GTO with a less than optimal cam making 487 at the wheels. We're gonna try one of our cams in it when things slow down a bit here. (yeah right)

[ujokin2]

Dang that is jumping into my HP range.... and probably cost less to get there too LOL

is that a normal range for the A/F mixture ? On the LXs that would be too LEAN or is it rich ? the LX's numbers are around 12-13

[ujokin2]

With just a cam swap, that would be a big fat no.
The LS3s are 6.3 litre with L92 heads and L76/LS3 intakes. Headers and a tune and they make 410ish. The before numbers were headers/tune/CAI.
We/I have great results with the L92 head combos. I have 2 of the top 5 power makers on record. One is a 6.0 GTO with a less than optimal cam making 487 at the wheels. We're gonna try one of our cams in it when things slow down a bit here. (yeah right)



That is alot of power to the wheel but aren't the GOATS known for having BAD traction from the get go?

[grn95t/a]

[QUOTE=socalmach;6250]Most pics won't load on a govt computer.


ah i see

[edcmat-l1]

Dang that is jumping into my HP range.... and probably cost less to get there too LOL

is that a normal range for the A/F mixture ? On the LXs that would be too LEAN or is it rich ? the LX's numbers are around 12-13

If you're talking about were the cursor is, thats at the hit, and it takes a couple seconds for it to register correctly. The A/F was about 13:1 until 5000, and the dropped slightly to about 12.7/12.8. No power was gained by leaning it out up top, so I put it back to where it is now.

[edcmat-l1]

That is alot of power to the wheel but aren't the GOATS known for having BAD traction from the get go?

Its not a goat. C6. And they dont exactly get good traction either.