PDA

View Full Version : deanna favre to replace brett.......


blazin_slp_z28
01-20-2008, 07:20 AM
Quarterback for the Packers...

In a news conference Deanna Favre announced she will be the starting QB for the Packers this coming Sunday. Deanna asserts that she is qualified to be starting QB because she has spent the past 16 years married to Brett while he played QB for the Packers. During this period of time she became familiar with the definition of a corner blitz, and is now completely comfortable with other terminology of the Packers offense. A survey of Packers fans shows that 50% of those polled supported the move.

Does this sounds idiotic and unbelievable to you? Well, Hillary Clinton makes the same claims as to why she is qualified to be President and 50% of democrats polled agreed. She has never run a City, County, or State.
When told Hillary Clinton has experience because she has 8 years in the white house, Dick Morris stated 'so has the pastry chef'.

novajoe
01-20-2008, 01:12 PM
I am not a politician but I did stay at a holiday Inn Express last night! LOL

Jazz
01-21-2008, 01:20 PM
Honestly I don't trust anyone who is connected enough to actually get the nomiation for anything higher than dog catcher. The whole darn lot of them are crooked if you ask me. Honestly I won't be really worried unless Hillary gets the nod. I'm not excited to vote for someone else but I'll definitely head to the polls to vote against her!

novajoe
01-21-2008, 02:59 PM
Honestly I don't trust anyone who is connected enough to actually get the nomiation for anything higher than dog catcher. The whole darn lot of them are crooked if you ask me. Honestly I won't be really worried unless Hillary gets the nod. I'm not excited to vote for someone else but I'll definitely head to the polls to vote against her!


I understand how you feel, what we need is a gear head in office!

Someone who can see what is wrong, and what something can become, and has a real plan on how to do it!

We don't need another slick CEO want a be, But someone who cares about the country over them self! Who that is? I have no clue!

blazin_slp_z28
01-21-2008, 07:49 PM
personally, i'm a huckabee fan. i'm conservative GOP. i could live with Romney and McCain, but they have some liberal bones in their bodies...Ron Paul is a psycho...like mike from hrf....he preaches alot of what everyone wants to hear but has no plan nor even thought of the consequences of what would happen if his plan was implemented.....

Lucy Lu Who
01-22-2008, 08:48 AM
Ok, if we are going to slam someone lets be fair. I understand not liking Hillary but comparing her to the Favre wife doesn't work. First of all because you can say the same thing for Reagan and Kennedy. And look at GW Bush, he was a governer and he got us into a war that we can't get out of.

My reasons for not liking Hillary she was a carpet bagger that went into New York and took and easy state. She doesn't know where the hell she stands on the war or the economy. But, let her jerk a few tears out and bam she wins Nevada.

Then there is Obama who has basicly the same amount of experience as Clinton. And if you look at his voting record that speaks volumes on the man.
The fact that Pat Robertson is backing him doesn't help his situtation.

Mitt Romney, is a total no go for me. Yes we have freedom of religion in this country, but coming from a town that was taken over by Mormons, unless you are part of that religion forget any other religions getting their two cents in anymore.

McCain, I guess I could live w/ him but I just don't see him having the hustpa to put the middle east in their place.

Then Huckabee, what can I say about him. He is deeply religous, and there being a seperation of church and state with him is slim. I believe in your right to believe what you want. My problem w/ the Christian groups is their stance on stem cell research. They are only thinking about the good of their morals and not the good of the whole. The research alone could have helped millions on organ transplant lists or burn victoms. But no according to them we are killing babies. So, don't get sick because the research to save your live is playing God. Instead of thinking that God may have given us this knowledge to save our butts.

The rest of the choices are not promising either. I don't think any of them are going to support the working man. It is going to be more helping the growth of CEO's and wealthy men like Ken Lane (enron) or the Donald Trumps of the world.

Jazz
01-22-2008, 10:04 AM
Anybody but Romney - He's a mormon, enough said. Clinton, well, if we elect her we deserve whatever we get. Barrack, he's a communist but at least he means well. None of the choices are good ones. Flip a coin, its only going to get worse whoever from the bunch is president.

blazin_slp_z28
01-22-2008, 04:43 PM
My reasons for not liking Hillary she was a carpet bagger that went into New York and took and easy state. She doesn't know where the hell she stands on the war or the economy. But, let her jerk a few tears out and bam she wins Nevada.

this was exactly my point in posting what i did originally. she talks like she's all that and in reality, she was nothing more than the wife of an ex president who condoned his action in and out of the white house. like you said, she went where she could get an easy win and have a footing for running for president. how much voting can she get done while on the road? not a very good way to represent your people.......especially after only doing it for what 3 years?

Lucy Lu Who
01-22-2008, 06:41 PM
Cool, at least we agree that we don't want a cross dresser in the White house.

novajoe
01-24-2008, 10:40 PM
Dose anyone trust a word that any of them have said.